Thursday, January 26, 2012

It’s All About Greece




Barbara Byrne Denham, Chief Economist





I recommend Greg David’s blog piece issued yesterday on New York City’s economy citing Eastern Consolidated’s recent Employment Alert. It is always good to review New York City’s statistics to understand how the city is doing. Our soon-to-be-issued Manhattan Economic Indicators carefully analyzes the fourth quarter data and provides commentary on what the statistics mean for the coming year.



I also recommend the New York Times recent article on how the International Monetary Fund is trimming its estimates for global growth. It covers a lot of bases on the state of the global economy.



The I.M.F. cut its growth forecasts for almost every region in the world. For Europe, the I.M.F. expects the region to contract by 0.1% instead of its earlier forecast of 1.4% growth, issued in September.



Its forecast for the United States did not change, but it did warn that American banks face exposure to the European debt crisis.



Much of the talk these days is about Europe and the current negotiations between Greece, its private lenders and the European Central Bank. Why does this news matter here in New York?



First, so little is moving in the market because of the uncertainty that a lack of resolution to this Greek debt has generated. The Greek government is due to pay 14.4 billion euros to bond holders in March, or it will default. Officials are trying to get the banks to agree to a 50% “haircut.” The ultimate agreement will have a significant impact on the banks and the ECB whether they agree to the cut or not. The impact from a default would be significant and right now the market believes that banks will agree to the 50% discount. But this effective write-down will hurt banks’ capital just as the last Basel III agreement is requiring banks to increase capital ratios. How this all will be resolved in the next two months is still anyone’s guess.



This is why Wall Street is quiet, why the office leasing market has stalled, why fewer large office buildings have traded and why financial service companies are shedding jobs: because the outlook in Europe is still so unclear.



It’s important to stay informed on this and many other economic-related topics as much beyond our five boroughs affects New York City’s economy.

Thursday, January 12, 2012

Back to Work




Barbara Byrne Denham, Chief Economist




What happened last quarter? Did everyone start their holiday in mid November? The volume of commercial property sales fell by more than 40% in the fourth quarter to $6.1 billion from $10.7 billion in the third quarter.



Nearly every property type outside of hospitality saw a decline, but the slowdown was most pronounced in multifamily and office property sales, both of which registered half the volume that was traded in the third quarter.



The lackluster fourth quarter results were indeed a casualty of the broader uncertainty from the European debt crisis that had escalated at the end of last summer. Combined with other tepid economic conditions in the U.S. economy, the lack of resolution in Europe put off investors for the short term.



The decline was primarily due to a lack of large transactions, the statistics clearly show that the small and mid-size deals are still trading. Moreover, little seems to suggest that this segment of the market will suffer in the near-term. Statistics on the U.S. economy are starting to improve (see future blogs), and New York City’s real estate market is still considered one of the safest investments in the world. Those who fear Europe may in fact shift their focus away from the continent and towards the U.S.



As per President, Daun Paris, “Our investors are still eager to buy in the current market despite the bad news from Europe –and maybe because of the conditions in Europe they are even more interested in buying in New York City. Still, we’re just not seeing as many large transactions as we had six months ago.”

























Thursday, December 15, 2011

It's the End of the Year: Time for an Outlook?




Barbara Byrne Denham, Chief Economist



It is inevitable in my line of work to be asked what my forecast is for the coming year. People want to know where the economy is headed, and there are pronounced concerns given all of the uncertainty with Europe, the tepid U.S. economy, layoff announcements from Wall Street and the steady release of very mixed statistics overall -- some signs of progress but just as many disappointments.


I always hesitate when asked this question because every year there is always a great deal of uncertainty, both domestically and abroad. Is this year all that different from the last few?


Consider the number one concern last year: oil prices had spiked due to the tumultuous activity in Egypt and the Middle East. Doesn’t that seem like a long time ago? The second most significant worry was the earthquake in Japan: many feared that it would disrupt the flow of goods around the world which would affect both GDP and job growth. Both of these stories made headlines but had faded from view by mid-year.


Europe had not been as much of a concern at this point last year but now is the number one most pressing concern. Each week, the news from Europe flip-flops back and forth: will they come to an agreement to handle the overall debt crisis or will some countries abandon the Euro? It had looked like a 50-50 call a month ago, but some promising developments have been reported and it appears that while Europe will continue to lag the rest of the world, they will hopefully avoid the worst-case scenario of a default.


The U.S. economy definitely seems to be on more solid footing today than it was a year ago as employment growth has accelerated slightly, the debt crisis was avoided for the near term and consumption growth remains positive. Still, all of this growth is at very low rates and nothing suggests that this rate of growth will accelerate any time soon.


What does appear to be the chief concern locally is the outlook for Wall Street: banks have issued record low earnings reports for the last two quarters; most have announced layoff plans and a number are cutting back on real estate. New York City is beholden to Wall Street for much of its economy – its high-paying workforce spends the bulk of their earnings in the city for condos, private schools, charities and cultural institutions, retail and restaurants. More importantly, the wage earners contribute a significant share of tax revenues to the city. Everyone is forecasting that Wall Street firms will shed another 5,000 or more jobs, and wages including bonuses will drop proportionately.


This will have a significant impact on the local economy, but the rest of New York City’s industries should continue to add jobs so the net gain should remain positive for the year. Where will this growth come from?


Tourism remains strong. European travelers to New York will likely drop in 2012, but other countries that have stronger economies could make up for these losses. The U.S. is reportedly stepping up its tourism marketing efforts abroad which should have a disproportionately greater impact on New York than other U.S. locales.


Private education institutions continue to expand. A number of local universities have accelerated expansion plans in connection with the city’s call for bids on a new engineering campus on Roosevelt Island or in Brooklyn. Hopefully, these plans will yield at least some job growth next year.


Finally, technology-related industries are hiring aggressively, at least that is what a number of anecdotal reports have said. While my monthly jobs numbers have yet to show significant growth in these industries, a few firms such as Facebook, Twitter and Tumblr have leased or are looking to lease space, and it seems as if this industry moves in herds just as Wall Street does . So when Google bought its 1.8-million-square-foot city headquarters building last year and announced plans to expand, other firms seemed to have responded in kind.


Yes, everything seems to circle back to real estate. New York City has had its ups and downs, but businesses prefer to operate in New York City because of its real estate, its central location, its transportation infrastructure and its density of talent. Moreover, the recent property sales data has indicated that investors remain more eager to buy properties in New York, especially multifamily properties, than elsewhere because of the stability. With the stock market volatility as high as its been, this is not surprising . And foreigners especially have had more faith in New York and the dollar than nearly anywhere else in the world. Why should this change?


Therefore, my outlook remains positive. I do not anticipate much accelerated growth in the statistics, either in New York or the U.S. but the good news should certainly outweigh the bad in the next year.


Barbara Byrne Denham directs the Research Center at Eastern Consolidated and is the Editor of its three quarterly newsletters, The MetroGrid Report, Manhattan Economic Indicators, and the Manhattan Commercial Property Sales Report; the monthly NYC Employment Alert; as well as a series of Research Reports, all of which are regularly cited in the press.









Thursday, September 8, 2011

How Far We’ve Come Since 9/11


Barbara Byrne Denham, Chief Economist

On this important 10 year anniversary, it is important to reflect on so much that 9/11 wrought on our country – the loss of lives and our sense of security to name a few. We also like to remember the extraordinary heroism that emerged on that day.

But another ritual we like to take on anniversaries is to measure how far we’ve come and, in particular on the anniversary of 9/11, it is significant that we take note of all that was accomplished in the last 10 years.

On the economic and real estate front, recall the vast uncertainty that arose in the weeks following that sunny Tuesday when so many office workers who felt lucky to be alive were displaced from their work place. Many firms worked overtime to set up operations in hotels and made other contingency plans. The most memorable move was when Morgan Stanley sold its brand new building at 750 Seventh Avenue to Lehman Brothers and subsequently purchased the former Texaco Headquarters in Westchester County in order to decentralize its operations. Not for the first time (or the last), many worried that Wall Street firms would flee Manhattan.

However, the uncertainty settled quicker than most expected and the damaged buildings were repaired within months. Not only did the fear that businesses (and residents) would leave Manhattan fade rapidly but the desire to live and work in Manhattan soared.

Just to show how in demand Manhattan has been for residents, tourists, employers and even students, consider how much has been built since 9/11:

• We have added 42 new office buildings with another 10 underway or in late planning stages including the World Trade Center towers; these buildings have added 20.2 million square feet of space and the future buildings will add another 15.4 million square feet. This is a significant milestone as more than 16 million square feet of office space was destroyed on 9/11.

• We have added 427 new residential buildings with nearly 54.5 million square feet of housing. According to the Census Bureau, this new housing has added 48,950 housing units (since 2000).

• We have added 104 hotels including more than 16,000 hotel rooms.

• Moreover, Manhattan developers have purchased more than 1,000 development sites since 2001.











Eastern Consolidated, CoStar and Property Shark

And these don’t even include the renovated buildings.

Indeed, it will be a solemn weekend for sure, but we should find some solace in knowing how strong and dynamic our city has become in 10 years.

Wednesday, July 6, 2011

NYC vs. the World's Largest Cities



Barbara Byrne Denham, Chief Economist

I often get swept up in all of the regional economic statistics every month trying to explain where the economy and real estate market is headed and neglect to consider where New York City stands as a global city.

Every now and then I thoroughly appreciate a more macro analysis of the New York City economy vis-à-vis the rest of the world. One of the best studies I’ve seen in years that compares New York to other large cities around the world was conducted by the New York City Partnership and PricewaterhouseCoopers. The study, “Cities of Opportunity 2011,” its fourth annual analysis, features the performance of 26 cities, all capitals of finance, commerce and culture.

The methodology was designed to maximize transparency and simplicity for readers. It uses publicly available data supported from global multilateral development organizations such as the World Bank, national statistics organizations and commercial data providers. A total of 66 variables were selected and divided into the following 10 indicator groups: intellectual capital and innovation; technology readiness; transportation and infrastructure; health, safety and security; sustainability; economic clout; ease of doing business; cost; demographics and livability, and finally, lifestyle assets (culture) which New York City scored the highest in along with technology readiness.

The surprising and impressive result of the study is that overall New York outranks all of the other cities on the above criteria with a slim edge over Toronto, San Francisco, Stockholm and Sydney.

Even more illuminating are the interviews from a series of experts including Rem Koolhaas, Judith Rodin and Mortimer Zuckerman. All are both complimentary and critical of New York and other cities but their perspectives from lifelong careers provide sound advice to any urban enthusiast. Check out the study on

http://www.pfnyc.org/reports/2011-Cities-of-Opportunity.PDF

Barbara Byrne Denham directs the Research Center at Eastern Consolidated and is the Editor of its two quarterly newsletters, The MetroGrid Report and Manhattan Economic Indicators, the monthly NYC Employment Alert, as well as a series of Research Reports, all of which are regularly cited in the press.

Tuesday, May 31, 2011

Census 2010: Bogus?



Barbara Byrne Denham, Chief Economist


Much has been said about the extremely low 2010 Census population data for New York City. Just last week, the New York Times reported that the outcry on the very low population increase for much of Queens and Brooklyn was justified based on their own analysis in which they were able to invalidate the high vacancy rates that the Census takers found in numerous neighborhoods.


In order to put the decennial census numbers (showing a population growth of just 167,000 or 2.1%) in perspective, we compared the official decennial Census numbers with other aggregate statistics for New York City.


The graph below shows how the “official” 2010 Census number and derived growth compares to the annual “estimates” produced by the Census Bureau. These annual estimates take into account a number of statistics including births, deaths and net migration. This chart also shows the growth in the New York City labor force.


The labor force statistics are based on estimates produced by the Bureau of Labor statistics that are derived from the Current Population Survey (CPS), a sample survey of about 50,000 national households that provides comprehensive data on the labor force, the employed, and the unemployed. The Labor Department estimates the local labor force numbers using the CPS, employment statistics from the survey of employers (CES), and the unemployment insurance system. [More]

Monday, May 9, 2011

The Transformation of Chelsea



Barbara Byrne Denham, Chief Economist

Few neighborhoods in Manhattan have undergone as complete a transformation as Chelsea has over the last decade. Starting in the mid 1990s, artists moved to Chelsea from SoHo. Foot traffic increased as did interest in the Meatpacking district and the opening of hip restaurants such as Pastis and high-end retail such as Stella McCartney. More recently, the re-development of the High Line spurred tremendous residential and hotel development in the area, the most notable of which was the Standard Hotel that opened in 2009. Finally, the opening of the Apple Store at West 14th Street and Ninth Avenue cemented the area as a high-end retail destination.

The commercial property sales market for Chelsea – West 14th Street to West 30th Street west of Avenue of the Americas – includes so many transactions for art galleries and related spaces that they become their own property type. And the results show that art-related space in Chelsea indeed carries a premium when compared to most other property types.

-Sales of arts-related spaces picked up in the second half of 2010.

-Retail property prices have stayed remarkably healthy.

-Development site sales in the first quarter of 2011 have already surpassed that of 2010.

-Hotel sales have been strong: prices paid in 2010 neared $1,000 per square foot.

-The volume of multifamily sales has grown in line with all of Manhattan in that they more than doubled in 2010.

-Chelsea’s office market is in a class of its own: vacancy rates have been lower than in Midtown and Downtown but prices paid have been comparable, at least judging by Google’s recent purchase of 111 Eighth Avenue.

[Read more]

Barbara Byrne Denham directs the Research Center at Eastern Consolidated and is the Editor of its two quarterly newsletters, The MetroGrid Report and Manhattan Economic Indicators, the monthly NYC Employment Alert, as well as a series of Research Reports, all of which are regularly cited in the press.